All posts tagged lgbtq
Posted by Carolyn at TVH on March 13, 2013
On Thursday, February 7th, the reauthorization vote on the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) S. 47, a bi-partisan bill, was delayed in the Senate. A vote is expected early next week – probably late Monday, February 11th.
The Violence Against Women Act is vital federal legislation that provides funding and protections for victims of domestic and sexual violence. VAWA was first authorized in 1994, but was not reauthorized in 2012 because some republicans opposed the bill’s protections for LGBTQ and Native American victims and immigrant victims of domestic violence seeking Visas.
Yesterday, the Senate did reject a Republican alternative to S. 47. The alternative bill would have stripped protections for LGBTQ victims of domestic violence, removed a provision for Native American women, and shifted the focus of VAWA way from women and toward men.
What Can I Do?
We urge you to call your Senators on Monday, February 11th, and ask them to vote for S.47, a strong bipartisan bill that would reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, and vote NO on any further amendments that weaken VAWA’s protections.
You can call the Capitol switchboard at (202)224-3121 and ask to be connected to your Senators.
Please thank the Senators already co-sponsoring S. 47:
Senators Ayotte, Kelly (R-NH), Baldwin, Tammy (D–WI), Baucus, Max (D-MT) , Begich, Mark (D-AK), Bennet, Michael (D-CO), Blumenthal, Richard (D-CT), Boxer, Barbara (D-CA), Brown, Sherrod (D-OH), Cantwell, Maria (D-WA), Cardin, Benjamin (D-MD), Carper, Thomas (D-DE) Casey, Robert (D–PA), Collins, Susan (R-ME), Coons, Chris (D-DE), Cowan, Mo (D- MA), Crapo, Mike (R-ID), Donnelly, Joe (D-IN) Durbin, Richard (D-IL), Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA), Franken, Al (D-MN), Gillibrand, Kirsten (D-NY), Hagan, Kay (D-NC), Harkin, Tom (D-IA), Heinrich, Martin (D-NM), Heitkamp, Heidi (D–ND), Heller, Dean (R-NV), Hirono, Mazie (D-HI), Johnson, Tim (D – SD), Kaine, Tim (D-VA) King, Angus (I-ME), Kirk, Mark (R-IL), Klobuchar, Amy (D-MN), Landrieu, Mary (D-LA), Lautenberg, Frank R. (D-NJ) Leahy, Patrick (D-VT), Levin, Carl (D-MI) McCaskill, Claire (D-MO), Manchin, Joe (D-WV) ,Menendez, Robert (D-NJ), Merkley, Jeff (D-OR), Mikulski, Barbara (D-MD), Moran, Jerry (R-KS), Murkowski, Lisa (R-AK), Murphy, Christopher (D-CT) Murray, Patty (D-WA), Nelson, Bill (D-FL) Pryor, Mark (D-AR), Reed, Jack (D-RI), Reid, Harry (D-NV), Rockefeller, John D (D-WV), Sanders, Bernard (I-VT), Schatz, Brian (D-HI) Schumer, Charles (D-NY), Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NH), Stabenow, Debbie (D-MI), Tester, Jon (D-MT), Udall, Mark (D-CO), Udall, Tom (D-NM), Warner, Mark (D-VA), Warren, Elizabeth (D-MA), Whitehouse, Sheldon (D-RI), Wyden, Ron (D-OR).
Posted by christined55 on February 8, 2013
The National Task Force to End Domestic and Sexual Violence Against Women is imploring the 113th Congress to restore VAWA immediately. The new Congress is a change of leadership, and so there is of necessity a brief pause in advocacy efforts. But be ready to jump in and join the call to mobilize! Check out the the VAWA Tool Kit.
In California, statewide coalitions such as the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault are also helping to mobilize concerned citizens and advocacy groups in the same effort.
For a first-person perspective on the sorts of services that will be put in jeopardy if VAWA is not revived, and the impact on survivors of violence, read this excellent article from Truth Out!
STAY TUNED FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT VAWA AND HOW YOU CAN HELP.
Posted by Carolyn at TVH on January 3, 2013
So, I just did a big blog post about the Mallory Owens story, which has already had some twists and turns. Now there is apparently a NEW twist–this one being that Mallory’s lawyer has just quit after Mallory made a statement saying that the EARLIER statement theoretically put out by her lawyer with her consent, and featured on GLAAD… isn’t really what happened or doesn’t really represent what Mallory wanted to say.
The story is just getting more convoluted–there were rumblings that the beating was not done “because of” Mallory’s orientation and dating of Ally Hawkins… but that it was because Travis, Ally’s brother, was angry that Ally and Mallory had done drugs and prostituted themselves/each other.
In short, an already tragic, complex and horrible story is now tragic, complex, horrible and… confusing. I wonder personally if Mallory is being threatened by the Hawkins family, or members of it, and is thus changing her story to fit what they want portrayed about the incident. What about the previous time Mallory was assaulted by the brother, Travis? Was that before or after allegedly learning of this drugs and prostitution element? Who knows? I certainly do not. But I wonder.
However, I am leaving my earlier post up because I do believe that my observations about bystander intervention on the web are still quite valid and important. By the same token, I certainly don’t want to unintentionally spread misinformation or unclear information in the blog.
Consider this post a disclaimer for the previous and perhaps a “to be continued…”
No matter what, nobody deserves to be beaten as this young woman was beaten. That can still be safely said.
Posted by Carolyn at TVH on December 5, 2012
Something I have been thinking about when it comes to this blog is—what IS Bystander Intervention, really? Some of it is pretty obvious—stepping in to help a friend at a party when she is drunk and someone is clearly trying to take advantage of her. That’s bystander intervention. Hearing a friend of yours making sexist comments and telling him, “Dude, that’s not cool.” That’s bystander intervention.
It can be a big thing or a small thing. It can be done with words. Or with actions…
…can it be done online?
Weirdly, even though I’m writing this blog, I hadn’t thought so much about ONLINE bystander intervention until I read a recent series of news stories. This story got me thinking about a whole bunch of things, actually—bystander intervention was one thing. But also how we can’t really limit ourselves to one social problem at a time. Things are all intertwined—that woman who is homeless might be homeless because of domestic violence. That man who has substance abuse issues might be trying to deal with the pain of childhood molestation. Someone suffering racial discrimination is being impacted by a culture that also perpetuates other kinds of discrimination and suffering. We are truly all connected in so many ways.
This leads me to the story of Mallory Owens. There has been a lot on the news about this young woman, who went to the home of her girlfriend on Thanksgiving, where her girlfriend’s brother attacked and beat her so violently that she suffered brain bleeding and needed reconstructive surgery and two metal plates to restore her cheekbones. The young man, Travis Hawkins Jr., was charged initially with Second Degree Assault and was bailed out almost immediately.
There has been debate as to whether this attack was prompted by Mallory being an out lesbian—whether Travis attacked her due to her sexuality and dating of his sister. At first, Mallory’s family said emphatically that the attack WAS due to Mallory’s sexuality. It also came out that in a previous incident, Travis Jr. had attacked Mallory with a metal wrench and threatened to later “finish the job” he had started, and that Travis’ father several years prior had shot his own son in the stomach–and several years before THAT had discharged a firearm over the heads of his children in the bedroom. Clearly, there is a history of domestic violence in the family. And clearly, this was not the only time Travis Jr. had attacked Mallory.
Mallory’s family and friends rallied around and tried to raise awareness of the relatively minor charge of Second Degree Assault. A Facebook Community called “Justice for Mallory Owens” was formed and now has over 15,000 Likes and over 23,000 people talking about posts made on the Community Page.
Later, there was some confusion when Mallory—upon being released from the hospital—went to the home of her girlfriend and the Travis family for a press conference in which she said that she did NOT claim the attack as a hate crime. Then, not too many days later, she said that she had been tricked and intimidated into making the appearance at the Hawkins home, and maneuvered into a position where she had to make these statements. She then released a written statement saying she had been attacked due to her sexual orientation and that she was in continuing fear for her life.
As you can tell by reading this—there are a LOT of issues going on here, ranging from domestic violence to hate crimes, gay-bashing, child abuse, and more. But what is at the heart of it—the core of it—is that a 23 year old woman had gone to the home of her girlfriend to celebrate Thanksgiving, and was left beaten nearly to death, desperately injured, traumatized and terrified. She faces high medical bills that her family is going to struggle to pay. Her life will never, EVER be the same.
The hope of her and her family is that the charges will be upgraded to Attempted Murder. The likelihood that this was a hate-motivated crime seems extremely high. However, in Alabama, where the attack took place, there are no laws on the books that include attacks against gays and lesbians prompted by their sexual orientation as hate crimes. For these reasons and so many more, the future is uncertain for Mallory. She faces a long road of recovery ahead—physical, emotional, spiritual.
My heart breaks for her.
Now… what does this have to do with a bystander blog?
For one thing, according to reports, the girlfriend’s family did not intervene in the beating. They were passive bystanders. Why? Quite possibly out of fear. If this family has suffered child abuse and domestic violence in the way it clearly has, fear could quite easily paralyzed them. Right or wrong, they took no action. But it got me thinking about what might have happened if someone had intervened. Could they have done it safely? If so… how? These questions in and of themselves could make their own blog post. Or several.
But I was talking about Bystander Intervention and the Internet.
The INTERNET response to this tragedy really opened my eyes. Here, there are THOUSANDS of active bystanders—people responding to the Facebook Community. People posting in forums. People signing petitions urging the charges of 2nd Degree Assault to be upgraded. People sending money to help with Mallory’s medical expenses.
Can you by an active bystander on the internet? YOU DARN WELL BET YOU CAN. And being an active bystander here can make a difference just as profound as being one in other venues.
Like I said at the beginning of this post, we are ALL connected. You don’t have to be a woman to care about women’s issues. You don’t have to be an recovering addict to care about addiction issues or their connections to poverty and abuse. You don’t have to be a survivor of violence to know that violence in our homes and relationships is destructive, wrong, and pervasive.
And you don’t have to be gay or lesbian to care about Mallory Owens.
If you feel moved to be an active internet bystander when it comes to this issue, here are some links:
Posted by Carolyn at TVH on December 5, 2012